Kim Lenox | Romance Heroes -- and Real Heroes
I’ve heard the allegations before, and I’m sure you have too. They ("They") say that romance heroes (and heroines, for that matter) aren’t realistic portrayals. That they are such idealized fantasies that they can’t be taken seriously.
I know my personal preference: while I want a hero to be ultimately heroic – even if it’s reluctantly so -- the more flawed and complex he is, the better for me as a reader. Perfect and one-dimensional men just aren’t very interesting.
What about the physical aspects of a hero? I had a number of inspirations for Archer, my hero in NIGHT FALLS DARKLY. One was Eric Bana. Hubba hubba! He’s just a personal favorite actor of mine. I’d also found a piece of fantasy artwork on the artists’ website Deviant Art. If you’re interested you can view it here. So confession … yes, I guess as far as appearance goes, my hero, at least in my mind, was terribly idealized. Maybe I should have written: "The role of Archer, Lord Black, will be played by Eric Bana" on the inside of the book.
That wouldn’t work because … what’s attractive to my reader? What’s “hot” to thousands of different readers? I’ve recently joined a group blog with four other authors who write dark paranormal romance, and we’re in the planning stages. Our web designer is working with us on the design of the blog and we wanted a “hot” guy at the top. It’s become clear we’ve all got different ideas of what “hot” is and isn’t. One or two of us might agree on one particular model’s photograph, but the others didn’t agree at all.
Romance authors provide their readers with a basic physical “outline” of a hero, one that fits the story and the character. It’s up to the reader to fill in the more specific details in their mind. For instance, maybe I saw Eric Bana when I wrote the book, but you saw Orlando Bloom when you read it. Or perhaps you envisioned the delivery guy from Fed Ex that comes to your office every day. That’s what’s so great about romance novels – you get to decide and customize.
Whatever the case, in “real life” my heroes aren’t idealized. They don’t look like Eric Bana or Brad Pitt or Nathan Kamp (the model on the cover of NIGHT FALLS DARKLY). They don’t earn huge salaries and drive fancy cars (or carriages). My writing pal, Cindy Miles, and I went to NYC last week. We saw a couple of attractive male television personalities while we were in Times Square. Cool! But did those guys stop us in our tracks? No. But these guys did:
Talk about whipping out the cameras and snapping some shots. The NYPD and FDNY are as good as rock stars to us. Were they all tall, dark and handsome, with piercing blue eyes? I don’t remember any that looked like that. They looked like regular guys wearing uniforms. They are regular everyday heroes, like so many boyfriends, husbands, fathers, brothers and sons we know in our real lives. They are flawed and complex, but heroes nonetheless.
Despite the fact that the heroes in my books may be costumed in "handsome" and "tall" and boast a great set of abs, because those types of descriptions seem to translate well onto a romantic fantasy adventure page -- at their core they have all the authentic qualities of a real life “everyday” hero. That’s what makes them come alive.
So … a fantasy hero or a regular every day hero? Do you have a favorite? I don’t. I think women are entitled to both, and at the same time.
Kim Lenox
www.kimlenox.com/
6 Comments:
I agree, why choose? Why not have the fantasy and the reality?
I love rugged men, like Gerard Butler and Jeffrey Dean Morgan (who were both in the movie "P.S. I Love You" btw), blue-collar types. Much as I do in real life. Men who work with their hands and can fix a car or build something, who wear t-shirts and jeans and have a little grease under their fingernails and a 5 o'clock shadow.
In real life I love the mechanics who work in my building versus the guys in suits. Plus they're cool guys - funny and nice and helpful and endearing. Good guys. So my fantasy hero can also be my RL hero ;)
A guy who can fix the plumbing, the fence and do yard work is MY hero.
Okay, and fix my computer and help me recover lost files...that is high on my list of good things to be able to do.
And, wait, be a great father, that's pretty good too.
Oh, yeah, and a mentor and role model and be able to listen to me whine about stuff and most important....KEEP MY FEET WARM IN COLD WEATHER!!!
*evil grin*
Sara
Stacy,
Gwen has the hots for GB and JDM even if we had to watch that PS I Love You movie -- too too sad!
Stacy and Sara,
Right! I think a competent man is so sexy! They don't have to be rich or perfect looking. But a man who loves what they do and loves what they are doing ... yes! That's why all those guys in that (shortlived) TV show, MEN IN TREES were so fantastic!
Thanks for coming by!
Kim
Kim,
Congrats on the release, and great topic!
I agree about the stylized nature of how heroes look in romance novels. I think they serve a purpose as 'signals' about the hero's strength--hopefully his inner strength. :-)
I suppose there's the whole 'evolution' thing too--handsome, physically strong men with white teeth are good to procreate with. LOL
But you nailed it when you said that the people you took pix of were the NYFD. :-)
Best with the book!
Kris
Lately, I've been drawn to these posts because I'm interested in what other readers have to say. I've read all sorts of romance and I tend to bypass the descriptions unless they talk to me. I like very tall men and I like very pretty men with long hair. I read stories so I can experience the fantasy. Reality is boring enough. I walk around everyday looking at Joe the Plumber, I certainly don't want him in my stories. Not knocking anyone who does. Everyone has their comfort level. However, I don't let descriptions interfere with the book. If a story is good and appealing to me when I pick up the book, then I will read it.
I remember back when I was into Anne Rice and The Vampire Lestate, in an intervew she admitted that she saw Rutger Hauer as Lestat. For me, given Lestat's personality I saw someone different. One of her fans had drawn a picture of a very young Sting as Lestat and he would have been perfect also. I thought Tom Cruise was magnicient, although I'm NOT a big Cruise fan. I thought Rutger was too "rugged" and Lestat was too gentlemanly for that. Still, I read the books and did my own thing.
Some writers have gone overboard in their descriptions and that can get annoying where they take three or more paragraphs describing every inch of the man's face. In my stories, I give a general description once and the person can take it. If the guy is too tall, knock him down a few inches. If he's blonde, give him dark hair. I don't think it should hinder a person from reading a book.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home